# Social media MCP contract benchmark

> DunSocial passed 12 of 12 contract checks against the same 45-tool registry used at runtime. The result covers declared schemas and safety metadata—not live publishing, latency, engagement or customer outcomes.

Updated: 2026-08-20. Author and reviewer: [Ritheesh BS](https://www.dunsocial.com/authors/ritheesh-bs.md).

Download the versioned JSON dataset: https://www.dunsocial.com/research/social-media-mcp-contract-benchmark-v1.json

## Method

The checked-in benchmark test loads the public versioned dataset, imports the runtime MCP registry and evaluates each declared check. CI fails if the tool count, scopes, safety annotations or strict input schemas drift.


## Result: 12/12 contract checks

- 45 registered tools and non-empty descriptions.
- Least-privilege scope mapping for read, draft, schedule, publish, collection update and delete actions.
- Immediate publishing marked destructive and subject to user interaction.
- Empty publish targets/content and negative upload size rejected by schemas.

## What this does not prove

This is a first-party contract benchmark, not an independent competitor ranking. It does not use an authenticated customer workspace or social network and makes no claim about uptime, delivery success, latency, content quality, engagement or time saved.


## Disclosure

Produced by DunSocial under its [editorial and evidence policy](https://www.dunsocial.com/editorial.md).

## About this document

This is the Markdown representation of https://www.dunsocial.com/research/social-media-mcp-contract-benchmark. The HTML version of the same page is at the same URL. You can also request Markdown from any page by sending `Accept: text/markdown`.

Machine-readable summary of the whole site: https://www.dunsocial.com/llms.txt

## Company

- Product: DunSocial, https://www.dunsocial.com
- Legal entity: THISUX PRIVATE LIMITED, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
- Support: support@dunsocial.com
- Open the app: https://app.dunsocial.com/login